Limitations Of Performance Appraisal System: Performance Evaluation is the conventional determination to a presentation the executives interaction toward the finish of an endorsed term. Prescribed terms can be of any length, but they typically last for a year.
An employee’s objectives and deliverables are discussed during an interview as part of the Performance Appraisal process, and an overall evaluation of the employee’s performance is agreed upon.
Also See: Performance Appraisal in HRM: 7 Methods and Objectives
Performance evaluation is an administration device which is useful in spurring and really using HR. Even if the performance planning and appraisal system is well-designed and appropriate, human potential assessment is difficult. In this article, we will be discussing all the limitations of appraisal system.
Top 15 Limitations Of Performance Appraisal System
-
The Halo Effect:
In this scenario, the superior evaluates the individual based solely on their positive attributes. Negative characteristics are ignored. An evaluation of this kind will not accurately portray the employee. Additionally, promotions may be granted to employees who do not merit them.
-
The Horn Effect:
For this situation just the negative characteristics of the representative are thought of and in view of this examination is finished. Again, this will be detrimental to the organization because it may not accurately portray the employee.
Note: The difference between halo effect and horn effect is that halo focuses on positive attributes but horn effect focuses on negative attributes.
-
Tendency central:
In this instance, the superior provides an evaluation through central values. Because of this, some employees may receive promotions that they do not deserve, while others may not receive promotions at all.
Also See: Collective Bargaining: Definition, Objectives, features, advantages, Types
-
Strictness and leniency:
Some managers grade their employees lightly, while others are extremely strict. Employees who really deserve promotions may not get them because their bosses are strict, while employees who may not deserve promotions may get benefits because their boss is lenient.
-
Spill over impact:-
In this scenario, the boss evaluates the employee based on their performance in the past either positively or negatively. As a result, despite the employee’s improved performance, he may not receive the benefit.
-
Anxiety toward loosing subordinates and ruining relations :-
Many managers don’t wish to over-indulge their relations with their subordinates. As a result, when they evaluate the employee, they may award grades that are not required. This is unfair to employees who really deserve it.
-
Willingness and methods to be used:
The goodwill that exists between the senior and junior may sometimes be impacted by a very stringent evaluation. Also, it’s hard to compare employees when different departments in the same company use different methods of evaluation.
Also See: 15 Objectives of Human Resource Management
-
A lack of clarity:
Employee evaluation and growth are the goals of performance reviews. An association ought to try not to utilize one examination framework to accomplish the two goals. Before the appraisal system is designed, the specific system should be clarified and discussed with all managers and employees to gain their commitment. Any presentation evaluation framework, but great the plan, is probably not going to succeed assuming the chiefs and representatives are dubious of its targets.
It is incredibly troublesome in the event that not difficult to gadget a framework that will actually want to fulfil both execution and prize. It occurs because employees are more likely to resist receiving negative feedback and to react defensively when areas of current performance that need improvement are pointed out. It is a result of this sort of cross-over in purposes that the examination loses it’s basically and builds the contention between the chief and the representatives.
Also See: Strategic Hr Model: Meaning, Importance and Working
-
Errors in the appraisal include the following:
Radiance, Recency, Difference impacts: When a manager gives an employee a high or low rating across all teams due to a single quality, this is known as the “halo effect.” For example; If an employee has few absences, his manager might pay him well in all other areas.
When rating an employee’s performance, the recency effect occurs when a rater places a greater emphasis on recent events. A rater’s error of this kind is understandable. It might be hard for the manager to remember everything that happened, like; a half year prior.
Also See: Top 12 Duties, Responsibilities And Role of HR Manager
-
Uneven Performance:
Uneven Performance Standards Different people have different perspectives on things. What benefits some people may harm others. As a result, managers’ evaluations of their staff members differ. Because managers have different attitudes toward their employees, they may evaluate the same employees in very different ways, which may result in an appraisal system that is subjective and manipulative.
-
Cultural Factors:
Culture has a significant impact on the appraisal system because it should be compatible with the culture of the organization. If the organizational culture is authoritarian and non-participative in its approach to other employee-related policies, a system based on employee participation and openness would fail. When imported from another organization, ready-made performance review systems rarely function effectively. Cultural differences may have contributed to their failure. As a result, culture must be protected.
Also See: Competency Mapping: Definition, Process And Needs
-
Time Consuming
While it is suggested that a manager devote approximately one hour to writing performance evaluations for each employee, it can take hours to write the department’s PA and hours to meet with staff to review it, depending on the number of people being evaluated. Managers I know wrote PAs for more than 100 people.
-
Discouragement
Staff may become disengaged if the procedure is unpleasant. Encouragement, positive reinforcement, and a celebration of a year’s worth of accomplishments must be part of the process. Both the positive things an employee does over the course of a year and the problems that need to be fixed should be documented by managers and discussed during a performance appraisal.
-
Inconsistent
A manager may not be able to convey a consistent message to an employee if they do not keep accurate notes and records of employee behavior. We as a whole battle with memory with as occupied as we as a whole are so it is basic to record issues (both positive and negative) when it is new to us.
Also See: MICHIGAN MODEL OF HRM: Diagram, Advantages And Disadvantages
-
Rater Biases
It is hard to keep biases out of the PA process, and a mature manager and a very structured, objective process are needed to keep biases out. this happens when the rating is distorted by manager values. Bias can be caused by a variety of factors, including religion, age, gender, appearance, or other arbitrary categories. If the appraisal plan is not designed correctly, a manager’s strong dislike of a particular ethnic group will be reflected negatively in the evaluation.
So it was all limitations of performance appraisal system. If you liked this article then please share this with your friends.